<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The National Right to Work Committee® &#187; Stephen Albrecht</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nrtwc.org/tag/stephen-albrecht/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nrtwc.org</link>
	<description>No one should be forced to pay tribute to a union in order to get or keep a job.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boss Stern and the SEIU Want Your 401K</title>
		<link>http://www.nrtwc.org/boss-stern-and-the-seiu-want-your-401k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nrtwc.org/boss-stern-and-the-seiu-want-your-401k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NRTW Committee Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Impact of Unionization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forced-Dues for Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Grants to Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union boss power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Eisenbrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Albrecht]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nrtwc.org/?p=4143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
MoneyNews.com looks at the SEIU&#8217;s campaign to &#8220;centralize&#8221; all retirement plans, including your own 401K, under a new &#8220;retirement system&#8221;:
The SEIU, which was integral to the election of Barack Obama as president, is working with the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, on SEIU&#8217;s plan, called &#8220;the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.nrtwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Stern-Pink-Scarf-7.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1602" title="Stern Pink Scarf-7" src="http://www.nrtwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Stern-Pink-Scarf-7-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" /></a></p>
<p><a title="http://moneynews.com/StreetTalk/unions-401k-pensions/2009/03/17/id/328862" href="http://moneynews.com/StreetTalk/unions-401k-pensions/2009/03/17/id/328862">MoneyNews.com</a> looks at the SEIU&#8217;s campaign to &#8220;centralize&#8221; all retirement plans, including your own 401K, under a new &#8220;retirement system&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The SEIU, which was integral to the election of Barack Obama as president, is working with the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, on SEIU&#8217;s plan, called &#8220;the Retirement USA Initiative.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>Claiming that the retirement system in place now has &#8220;failed most Americans,&#8221; EPI vice president Ross Eisenbrey, told a labor union publication that &#8220;account balances have fallen by a third since late 2007, leaving many older workers unable to retire just as our economy is shedding millions of jobs.”</em></p>
<p><em>“The failure is broad and deep. It&#8217;s not just a few people falling through the cracks: most of us already are in the ravine. Three in 10 have only a 401(k) or similar savings plan, and the rest of us are totally out of luck,&#8221; said Eisenbrey.</em></p>
<p><em>Eisenbrey said that the median 401(k) account balance was $25,000 in 2006, and the median for workers near retirement was $40,000.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Half of those who had a 401(k) were nearing retirement with less than $40,000 in their account,&#8221; said Eisenbrey, who is trained as a lawyer and was a Clinton administration appointee from 1999 through 2001.</em></p>
<p><em>The proposed retirement system would be operated under the following parameters:</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Benefits that move with you, even if you change jobs</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Payouts only at retirement</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Shared responsibility among employers, the government and employees</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>• Pooled assets, controlled by professional investment managers</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The financial crisis and the economic recession have shone a spotlight on the inadequacies of today&#8217;s system,&#8221; said Stephen Albrecht, director of benefits for SEIU.</em></p>
<p><em>With the uncertainty in today&#8217;s global economy, creating a whole new federal entitlement for American workers may not be easy to accomplish for these groups or their allies on Capitol Hill and in the Obama administration, as America&#8217;s creditors are already getting nervous.</em></p>
<p><em>Chinese Premier Wen Jinbao is telling U.S. policymakers that he is concerned about the &#8220;safety&#8221; of his country&#8217;s already huge holdings of U.S. debt.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We have lent a huge amount of money to the United States,&#8221; said Wen, according to a report in the Financial Times. &#8220;We are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am a little worried. I request the U.S. to maintain its good credit, to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China&#8217;s assets.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nrtwc.org/boss-stern-and-the-seiu-want-your-401k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

