Matt Mayer of the Buckeye Institute debunks the long-term economic growth without Right To Work freedom is sustainable. Mayer uses a Columbus Dispatch reporter Joe Hatlett column that featured Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm to expose the fact that corporate welfare and reduced regulations ignore the “proverbial elephant in the room weighing down” compulsory union states like Indiana, Ohio, Illinois,, and Michigan.

From Matt Mayer’s post:

“With Michigan bleeding jobs and tax revenues, Granholm said she followed the corporate playbook in her attempt to close a huge state budget deficit and make Michigan more competitive. ‘In listening to the business community, I cut takes [sic] 99 times, and I ended shrinking government more than any state in the nation. In my two terms, I cut more by far than any state in the nation. And yet, we still have the highest unemployment rate.

There was no correlation.’ Granholm conceded that streamlining business regulations and lowering taxes — Kasich’s economic recovery mantra — are helpful, but they aren’t a panacea…[l]abor costs, help with start-up costs and proximity to markets are other factors.”

Hallett and Governor Granholm fail to mention why streamlining regulations and lowering taxes aren’t helping the northern states (located within 50 percent of the U.S. population and with low start-up costs) compete against the southern and western states. Instead, Hallett ignores the obvious answer and pleads for an end to corporate pork (with which we enthusiastically agree).

The reason Michigan and Ohio can’t compete is that the southern and western states already have fewer regulations and lower taxes, so “catching up” with those states still leaves the proverbial elephant in the room weighing down the northern states. Plus, those states are also pushing for lower taxes and fewer regulations, so the northern states are perpetually behind them. The elephant, which Governor Granholm does hint at, is labor costs, or, more specifically, unionized labor costs (see: General Motors and the United Auto Workers).

As I noted in Six Principles for Fixing Ohio, “Of course, tax and regulatory burdens also impact a state’s economy. Although many of the forced unionization states have heavy tax burdens and many of the worker freedom states have light tax burdens, some heavily taxed worker freedom states (Idaho, Nevada, and Utah) had the strongest sustained job growth from 1990 to today.

Similarly, a few moderately taxed forced unionization states still had weak job growth (Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri). The combination of both a heavy tax burden and forced unionization is deadly when it comes to job growth, as 11 of the 15 worst performing states are ranked in the top 20 for high tax burdens.” If Ohio and the other states from Missouri to Maine want to truly compete with Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina, then those states need to enact laws that protect the rights of workers not to join a labor union to get a job. (more…)

From Missouri State Sen. Robert N. Mayer’s Op-Ed in the Southeast Missiourian ‘Right to work’ equals jobs:

More than 280,000 Missourians are out of work. The alarm is sounding and we should all hear the wake-up call that now is the time to put all the pieces in place so Missouri can truly compete for jobs.

Currently, Missouri is missing out on new jobs because companies are drawn to other states with better worker protection laws. Fifty percent of manufacturers refuse to consider Missouri as a place to locate new jobs because we have no protections against forced unionization of our workers — that’s according to testimony given to the Senate General Laws Committee by Mark Sweeney. Sweeney is a site location consultant who works to find new plant sites for both domestic and foreign manufacturing companies. He says Missouri is off the radar for 50 percent of his clients, plus the rest consider right-to-work laws when weighing which state they will choose.

Not having right-to-work has cost us in many ways.

First, Missouri is losing a congressional seat due to the most recent census data. That data shows businesses with jobs and the workers who take them are fleeing to states with worker protection laws. Non-right-to-work states lost a total of nine congressional seats and, due to population shifts, right-to-work states gained 11. This session we have the opportunity to correct this wrong by bringing beneficial jobs to Missouri while keeping hard-working citizens in our state.

Second, we have underperformed compared with the six of our eight neighboring states that are right-to-work states. All those states have lower unemployment rates than Missouri. Tennessee, the only one with a comparable rate to ours, gained jobs in 2010 while Missouri lost jobs.

Plus, data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows unemployment is lower in the 22 states that have adopted right-to-work laws. In the last decade, those states have added 1.5 million private sector jobs, while non-right-to-work states have lost 1.8 million jobs. With more than 160,000 jobs lost in our state since June 2008, we cannot afford to stand by and not take action. (more…)

Right to Work Kansas 51, compulsory union Missouri 10

Former Missouri state treasurer and candidate for U.S. Senate Sarah Steelman says Right To Work “always works better than coercion” (Joplin Globe):

The statistics are clear: Kansas is winning the battle of economic opportunity. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates Kansas is not only increasing its employment numbers, but it is adding higher-paying jobs at a faster rate as well.

From the years 1990 to 2007, Kansas’ total employment grew 46.9 percent and private employment grew 51.9 percent.

Over the same period, Missouri’s total employment grew only 12.6 percent while private employment increased 10.8 percent.  Right-to-work legislation has helped Kansas attract jobs and grow wages, while our state has stagnated. It is clear that Missouri has to change the way our state does business. We should start by adopting right-to-work.

Let’s put workers back in charge of their unions. Freedom always works better than coercion. A free labor market is more efficient, more dynamic and more fair. Our economy will be more productive, and increased productivity creates more opportunity, more jobs and more wealth for everyone. Missourians need jobs now — our employers and workers can no longer afford to wait.

Hey Mitch! This is Leadership

Click image to contact Gov. Daniels.

GOP Senate candidate in Missouri Sarah Steelman (R) joined a growing group of conservatives to to announce support of ‘Right to Work’ legislation in Missouri. “The first step that Missouri has to take to regain its competitive advantage is to become a Right to Work state. For too long we’ve seen jobs leave our country, and now its not just China we have to compete with, it’s the 22 States that have instituted free-market principles by passing Right to Work legislation,” Steelman said. “We should not be forcing workers to join unions. It is an infringement on their freedom. Missouri employers and workers deserve a competitive economic landscape,” she said.

This is leadership and courage.  Perhaps Miss Steelman can lend some to Mitch Daniels!

Subscribe to The National Right to Work Committee® Posts by Email

Missouri on the Move for Job Creation

KTTS reports that Missouri is moving forward in the effort to protect workers and create jobs by enacting a Right to Work law.  

Mayer says that unemployment is lower in the 22 Right To Work states than it is in Missouri.

Senate leader Rob Mayer, a Dexter Republican, says unemployment is lower in the 22 Right To Work states than it is in Missouri.  He says six of eight neighboring states are right to work states.  

Readers in Missouri need to pick up the phone and let their leaders know — the time has come to make Missouri a Right to Work state.

Right to Work on the Move in Missouri?

Missouri State Sen. Jason Crowell wants Missourians to be able choose whether to join or not join a union without the choice being forced upon them to get or keep their job.

Missouri State Senator Jason Crowell  eloquently lays out the case for enactment of a Right to Work law in the Show-Me state.  It would create jobs and protect workers:

“Look no further than our own state to see how financial incentives fail to sway businesses. In a special session, the General Assembly gave labor-supported tax credits to Ford to entice it to locate a new product line to replace the Claycomo plant jobs that are leaving. But months after being offered those tax credits, Ford is still unwilling to commit to Missouri.

Maybe, before making their assertions, unions should look at the evidence of job growth found in the most current data available by the U.S. Department of Labor. Job creation in Right to Work states is growing 2.5 times faster than non-Right to Work states. From 2003 to 2008, the number of private-sector employees in RTW states grew at 9.1 percent compared to forced-union state employee growth of 3.6 percent.

Unions also allege there is evidence that RTW laws “are actually associated with lower wages.” That statement failed to share the real data. The truth is, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, from 2003 to 2008, personal income levels increased by 15.8 percent in Right to Work states compared to 9.1 percent growth in forced-union states. In fact, a recent study by Barry Paulson, a professor of economics at the University of Colorado, found the weighted average adjusted household income in Right to Work state metro areas was $4,258 more than in non-Right to Work state metro areas.

They should further consider that during the recession of 2001, Oklahoma became the most recent state to adopt Right to Work laws. In doing so, during that time, its median household income increased by $779 while the national median fell by $1,014, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. And, contrary to Sen. Green’s presumption, its poverty rate dropped by 1.5 percent while poverty increased by 0.8 percent nationwide.

Still, those protecting unions argue there is little economic impact to Right to Work initiatives. But forced-union states are losing billions of dollars because families are following the jobs and fleeing to Right to Work states. Since 2000, the IRS’s Statistical Information Service showed a net total of 1.63 million taxpayers have moved to Right to Work states. This migration to Right to Workstates has cost forced-union states from 2006 to 2007 a total of $18.3 billion in income without including the lost spending to local businesses.

The data on the economic benefits of making Missouri a Right to Workstate cannot be ignored and is why I oppose the current law that forces workers to financially support a union as a condition of their employment. If union members such as Sen. [Tim] Green continue to put unions first instead of Missouri’s working families, they will follow this economic model all the way to unemployment. No worker who chooses to join a union should be denied that choice, but no worker in Missouri should be forced to join a union just to hold a job.”

Right To Work a “priority” for Missouri Legislature

Right To Work Laws guarantee the freedom of choice to join or not to join a union. (source: NILRR.org)

According to Michael Langenberg of Missouri’s KMOX, “Missouri’s legislators have made passing the “Right to Work” bill a priority for next year, saying if it passes, businesses could not require a worker to join a union.”