The National Right to Work Committee®
  • Home
  • About You
  • ABOUT US
  • BLOG
  • LEGISLATION
  • multimedia
  • facts
  • newsroom
  • Contacts
  • Donate Today!
"Obama Rewards Government Union Bosses, Again: Government worker unions are President Obama’s… http://t.co/QGYDnsUr" — Right2Work

Forced-Unionism Issue Looms Large For 2012

On August 8, 2011, By NRTW Committee Staff

Right to Work Committee Begins Lobbying Presidential Hopefuls

(Source: July 2011 NRTWC Newsletter)

This summer, New Hampshire is the site of an extended battle over the Right to Work issue, as pro-Right to Work citizens seek to secure two-thirds majority votes in the state House and Senate to override Big Labor Gov. John Lynch’s veto of legislation (H.B.474) prohibiting compulsory union dues and fees.

Because Right to Work has been in the New Hampshire news since both chambers of the state’s General Court approved H.B.474 earlier this year, WMUR-TV (ABC) news anchor Josh McElveen decided to bring up the issue at the June 13 GOP presidential debate at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H.

Mr. McElveen asked former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, one of the seven 2012 presidential hopefuls participating in the debate, whether he would, if elected, support “a federal Right to Work law.”

Mr. Pawlenty ignited the debate’s longest and most enthusiastic round of applause with his response:

“We live in the United States of America, and people shouldn’t be forced to belong [to] or be a member in any organization, and the government has no business telling people what group you have to be a member of or not.

“I support strongly Right to Work legislation.” (more…)

Tagged with: Arthur Laffer • Gary Johnson • John Lynch • Jonathan Williams • Mark Mix • Michele Bachmann • National Right to Work Committee • Ron Paul • section 14b • Stephen Moore • Taft-Hartley Act • Tim Pawlenty • Wall Street Journal • WMUR-TV
Posted in: Bailouts to Unions, Big Labor Payback, Economic Development in RTW States, Economic Impact of Unionization, Economics, Forced-Dues for Politics, Government Grants to Unions, Legislation, National Right to Work Act, NLRB, NRTWC Newsletter, Obama Administration, Political Activity, Right to Work, Right To Work States, Section 14-B Taft-Hartley
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Right to Work Key For Economic Recovery

On March 11, 2010, By NRTW Committee Staff

Latest Data Show Exodus From Forced-Unionism States Continues

(Source: January 2010 NRTWC Newsletter)

Without a doubt, much about the U.S. economy has changed since the real estate crash of 2007 and the extraordinary mortgage-loan crisis that soon followed in its wake.

However, as the dust from the recent turmoil slowly settles it is becoming clear that many important and longstanding economic trends have not changed over the past couple of years.

A U.S. Census Bureau report issued just last month is illustrative.

The report shows a continuation of the massive exodus of employees and their families from forced-unionism states that the Census Bureau has documented ever since it began tracking state-to-state domestic migration during the 1990′s.

From July 1, 2008 through July 1, 2009, a net total of more than 339,000 Americans moved from forced-unionism states to Right to Work states.

And since April 1, 2000, there has been a net transfer of nearly five million Americans to Right to Work states.

‘Employees of All Kinds Are “Speaking” With Their Feet’

“While both forced-unionism states and Right to Work states were rocked by the mortgage-loan debacle, Right to Work states retain far superior job-market fundamentals and are now poised to enjoy rapid economic growth once again,” noted Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Committee.

“That’s why the latest Census Bureau data continue to demonstrate the harmfulness of the federal labor-law provisions that empower Big Labor to get workers fired for refusal to pay dues or so-called ‘agency’ fees to an unwanted union.

“Employees of all kinds are ‘speaking’ with their feet.

“Millions have sought out and accepted jobs in the 22 states with Right to Work laws, which protect employees from being fired for refusal to pay dues or fees to a union.”

While Americans of all ages have moved to Right to Work states, young employees and entrepreneurs seeking higher incomes clearly constitute a major part of the ongoing transfer.

Between 1998 and 2008, the number of Right to Work state residents in the 25-34 age bracket increased by 16%, from 14.36 million to 16.65 million. Meanwhile, the population aged 25-34 of non-Right to Work states fell from 24.32 million to 24.17 million. (Oklahoma, which adopted its Right to Work law in 2001, is counted as a Right to Work state for the entire period for consistency’s sake.)

Tax Filers Report Higher Incomes After Moving to Right to Work States

And multi-year data supplied by the Statistical Information Service (SIS) of the IRS show that tax filers who move to a Right to Work state consistently report higher adjusted gross incomes than do tax filers moving out of a Right to Work state.

For example, the 1.523 million personal income tax filers moving to a Right to Work state between 2007 and 2008 reported a total of $76.432 billion in income in 2008, or roughly $50,190 per filer.

Meanwhile, the 1.338 million tax filers moving out of a Right to Work state during the same period reported a total of $61.773 billion in income in 2008, or roughly $46,165 per filer.

Right to Work States Constitute 15 of 16 With Best Economic Outlooks

A recent study by eminent economists Arthur Laffer, Stephen Moore, and Jonathan Williams provides additional confirmation that forced unionism eliminates job opportunities and cuts employees’ real incomes.

The 2009 study, entitled Rich States, Poor States and published by the American Legislative Exchange Council, identifies “15 policy variables that have a proven impact on the migration of capital — both investment capital and human capital — into and out of states.”

Fifteen of the 16 states ranked at the top for their current “economic outlook,” based on all 15 policy variables, have Right to Work laws on the books. And not one of the 15 bottom-ranked states has such a law.

“The 2009 Laffer-Moore-Williams ‘Economic Competitiveness Rankings’ sum up well the stark and widening contrast between the 22 Right to Work states and the 28 forced-unionism states,” said Mr. Mix.

“Government-sanctioned forced union dues and fees have predictable economic consequences.

“Where forced dues are legal, union bosses use their power to disrupt labor markets, jack up costs, and bankroll Tax & Spend, regulation-happy state legislators and governors.

“Therefore, the economies of forced-dues states are bound to continue falling further and further behind as long as Congress perpetuates the coercive federal labor-law provisions that are holding them back.

“In forced-dues states, Big Labor routinely insists on rigid work rules and cultivates the ‘hate the boss’ mentality to cement its power over employees.

“Unless they are protected by a state Right to Work law, independent-minded employees have no power to fight back against union bosses by withholding their financial support.

“And when employees have no personal freedom of choice, union bosses have little incentive to tone down their outrageous demands, massive political activity, and corrupt behavior.

“As a result, states that don’t have Right to Work laws are far less likely to reach their full productive potential and reap the accompanying benefits.”

Committee Helped Secure Senate Roll Call on Forced-Dues Repeal Last Year

“Fortunately, legislation that would protect private-sector employees and businesses from compulsory union dues and fees in all 50 states is now back on Congress’s radar screen,” Mr. Mix continued.

Last year, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), working hand-in-hand with the Committee, forced his colleagues to vote directly on the federal policy of compulsory unionism for the first time in more than a decade.

The DeMint Amendment to S.181, the so-called “Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,” would have removed all current provisions in federal labor law that authorize and encourage compulsory union dues and fees.

“Not surprisingly, the Big Labor Senate did not adopt the DeMint Amendment,” noted Mr. Mix.

“However, history shows that when politicians vote for compulsory unionism they often pay the ultimate political price.

“Over the years, voters have littered the political landscape with the corpses of politicians who publicly vote to force hardworking Americans to pay union dues just to get or keep their jobs.”

Mr. Mix vowed that the Committee would pursue the same “amendment strategy” it employed in the Senate to seek a House floor roll call on national Right to Work legislation this year.

Tagged with: Arthur Laffer • Jim DeMint • Jonathan Williams • Stephen Moore
Posted in: Economic Development in RTW States, Economic Impact of Unionization, Economics, Forced Dues, Legislation, Monopoly Bargaining, NRTWC Newsletter, Right to Work, State RTW
1 Comments
Leave A Response

Federal Legislative Action Alerts 

 

Facebook 

 

Blog Tags 

AFL-CIO AFSCME AFT Barack Obama Boeing California Card Check Craig Becker H.R. 413 Harry Reid Hilda Solis IAM Indiana Jim DeMint John Lynch Lafe Solomon Mark Mix Matthew Leen Michigan Mitch Daniels Nancy Pelosi National Labor Relations Board National Right to Work Committee National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation NEA New Hampshire New Jersey New York NLRB NLRB Nominations NRTWLDF OLMS PLA Public Employees Richard Trumka Right to Work Scott Walker SEIU South Carolina Teachers Teamsters UAW Wall Street Journal Washington Examiner Wisconsin
 

Right to Work Links 

  • Concerned Educators Against Forced Unionism
  • National Right To Work Committee FaceBook
  • National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.
  • Sign-Up For NRTWC's Free Once-a-Day Update Summaries
  • The National Institute for Labor Relations Research
 

NRTWC Blog Archives 

 

Blog Categories 

 
Go To Top »
  • Home
  • About You
  • ABOUT US
  • BLOG
  • LEGISLATION
  • multimedia
  • facts
  • newsroom
  • Contacts
  • Donate Today!