Rush Limbaugh Exposes “Real Reason” Big Labor Unrest in Wisconsin

Subscribe to The National Right to Work Committee® by Email

You need to install or upgrade Flash Player to view this content, install or upgrade by clicking here.

On February 17th, Rush Limbaugh exposed the “real reason” union bosses in Wisconsin are in a panic: the new law will allow Wisconsin’s government employees to “opt out of joining the union” rather than continue to be forced to pay union dues without a choice. 

Union bosses know, when given a choice, employees will not always willingly pay union fees. Also, union bosses know that if people can threaten to withhold dues, they can demand that the union become more responsive to its members.  This can be very inconvenient for the union hierarchy.

Big Labor has fought allowing employees to choose whether our not to pay tribute to a union boss every since President Franklin Roosevelt signed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).  The NLRA commanded every employee to pay fees to unions with employer collective bargaining contracts or be fired. 

Until the passage of Taft-Hartley Act, section 14(b), employees had no sanctuary from union bosses. After the Taft-Hartley Act, employees in states that passed laws protecting employees’ choices, the “Right To Work”, employees could not longer be forced to pay fees to union bosses against the employees’ will.  There are 22 Right To Work states today where employees still breath free air.

Share

80% of Union Members Agree, Right To Work is Best Policy

 

When asked, workers choose freedom, even union workers. In Frank Luntz’ recent poll, 80% of union members chose the Right To Work which allows individuals to freely choose whether or not to belong or pay fees to union.

Here is the question Luntz’ pollsters asked union members across the country and the results are above:

Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the following statement: “Workers should have the right to decide whether to join a union. They should never be forced or coerced to join or pay dues to a union as a condition of employment.”

For the complete Frank Luntz – National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation 2010 Union Member Survey click here.

Share

Obama Administration “Shaming” Companies into Forced Unionization

The Daily Caller reports that the Department of Labor has unveiled a “strategic plan” for the next five years that says “many of the Department’s outcome goals are furthered by high rates of union membership.”  By hook or by crook, the Administration seeks to force as many workers as possible in paying labor dues — and why not?  After all they are the political beneficiaries of Big Labor’s potential growth.

Share

Taxpayer Funded Union No-Show Jobs Everywhere

Public Sector Employee Monopoly Bargaining Running Amok!

Taxpayer funded federal, state, and municipal no-show jobs exist throughout the country.  In 2002, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) union Local 12 had 9 such full-time union time jobs at the United States Department of Labor.  These 9 union officials were working full-time on union activities as union employees and officers and never spent any time working as federal employees.  Yet, they were paid by the federal government (taxpayers).

In 2003, the NY-NJ Port Authority Police Department union was allowed to have four union officers/”police officers” spend their entire time working on union activity, and none for the Port Authority.  Yet, the Port Authority paid their salaries and benefits.

Now, during the NY City Big Snow Slowdown controversy, it comes to light that New York City taxpayers pay six (6) SEIU sanitation officers to work full time on union business, not city business.  BigGovernment .com has the report:

[Additional supporting information (to download complete supporting documentation packet, click here)]

Big Labor and politicians across the United States have transferred union costs to taxpayers.  For example, SEIU Local 444 (The Sanitation Officers Association, see related snow  slowdown stories) has six full-time union officials who are paid full-time city benefits and salary, yet work 0.00% of the time for New York City.  These Sanitation Officers are working on everything but New York City business – including political activities and golf outings – all on the taxpayers’ dime.

SEIU Local 444 – NY City Contract Language (pertinent part) (more…)

Share

Teacher Unions Must Collect their Own Dues

Governor Bob Riley speaks to a gathering of lawmakers and citizens before signing into law a series of sweeping anti-corruption reforms. Photo credit: Robin Cooper, Office of the Governor.

Alabama’s News 13: “A new era for state corruption reforms”

Governor Bob Riley signed what he called, some of the strongest anti-corruption laws in the country.

The legal departments at both unions are rechecking Senate Bill two.

Take a look at what some them will do: Ban the practice of secretly funneling money to political candidates, through political action committees, called “pac to pac transfers.” They also limit what lobbyists can spend on public officials and requires them to register and file disclosures.

Now a week old, Senate Bill 2 is being double and triple-checked by the legal departments of the state’s teacher unions. SB2 ends the practice of deducting union dues from paychecks. The unions say it’s political payback. Governor Riley calls it an end to financing political activity by special interest groups.

Jefferson County AFT President, Vi Parramore said, “I think hurrying an ethics bill through has been a disaster.”

Both unions agree, Hyche with the regional Alabama Education Association and Vi Parramore, President of the Jefferson County American Federation of Teachers, that senate bill two – ending the practice of deducting union dues from paychecks – was an attack on the AEA.

Parramore said, “But I think the bill is mean-spirited…”

Hyche said, “…the governor and Bradley Byrne hijacked the legislative process for political gain and for political payback.”

Where were these concerned union officials to be found when Harry Reid tried to ram through federally mandated monopoly bargaining on states during the Lame Duck?

Share

Home-Care Providers Take State To Federal Court

National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Press Release:

News Release

Home-Care Providers Take Case Challenging State Unionization Scheme to Federal Appeals Court

Right to Work Foundation assists home-based personal care providers pushed into union ranks against their will

Chicago, IL (December 13, 2010) – A group of home-based personal care providers have filed a federal appeal against Governor Pat Quinn and union officials for their agreement to force Illinois’s home-based personal care providers under unwanted union boss control.

With free legal aid from National Right to Work Foundation attorneys, the personal care providers filed their appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit after a district court judge ruled against them.

The appeal stems from a class-action lawsuit filed by the providers after Quinn signed an executive order designating 4,500 home-based personal care providers who care for individuals with disabilities as “public employees” and susceptible to unwanted union boss political “representation.”

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union bosses have been competing to force their monopoly control over the workers, even having out-of-state union organizers making “home visits” attempting to organize the providers through coercive “card check” unionization tactics. Not coincidentally, Quinn received the SEIU union bosses’ political endorsement and support during his closely-contested primary campaign earlier this year.

Quinn’s executive order mirrored one issued by disgraced former-Governor Rod Blagojevich, later codified, in which over 20,000 personal care providers were designated as state workers for the purpose of granting union bosses monopoly “representation” and forced dues privileges over them. Quinn’s executive order expanded Blagojevich’s to cover the additional 4,500 providers who were not included in the first executive order. (more…)

Share

Birmingham News Takes on Phony Card Check Arguments

From the Birmingham News:

The good news for Alabama union membership is bad news for state and national union leaders.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the number of union members in Alabama increased fairly significantly from 2008 to 2009. (See story here.) The portion of the state’s work force that is in a union rose from 9.8 percent in 2008 to 10.9 percent in 2009. The same report noted union membership was stable across the nation at 12.3 percent for 2009, essentially the same as 2008.

Alabama is the only state in the Southeast with double-digit union membership. A likely reason this good news for organized labor is being greeted with such surprise is that it works against the storyline unions want Americans to believe right now.

Unions are trying to get the Democratic Congress and President Barack Obama to go along with a provision that would make it easier for them to organize a workplace. The so-called “Employee Free Choice Act” still is organized labor’s No.1 priority. It’s such a high priority that the AFL-CIO has dropped its longtime support for U.S. Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and is now backing her challenger, Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill Halter, in this year’s Arkansas Democratic primary.

Union leaders should reassess their goals. Even with a heavily Democratic Congress, they haven’t been able to convince the honorables to tilt the playing field toward their favor. More than anything, the union leaders want Congress to approve something called “card check,” which would allow a union to organize a workplace by getting more than 50 percent of the workers at a particular company to sign a card asking for representation. That basically gets rid of the longstanding tradition of the secret ballot under current rules.

Right now, it takes only 30 percent of the workers in a company to ask for a union vote, but that vote is by secret ballot, as it should be. That way, neither management nor the union bosses can exert undue pressure. It’s easy to see how the card-check system, where a worker is asked to sign the membership card immediately, in front of colleagues, might be intimidating.

Back to Alabama, where instead of union membership declining, membership is increasing, even as unemployment continues to rise. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, union membership climbed by 10,000 workers in 2009, to a total of 181,000. The number of state residents represented by unions (they’re covered by union contracts but are not official union members) rose to 212,000, or 12 percent of all state workers.

Alabama’s percentage of union workers is more than double border states Tennessee (5.1 percent), Mississippi (4.8 percent) and Georgia (4.6 percent). Alabama’s story doesn’t help the unions make their case.

With Congress expected to become more Republican after this year’s elections, union leaders know they’re running out of time on this lousy card-check idea.

Share