Don’t believe that the NLRB’s attack on South Carolina’s Right to Work status is a shot in the dark. A newly discovered May 10, 2011 memo written by the NLRB general counsel’s office argues it is ok for the government to force businesses to provide unions with information about relocation decisions in advance.

Right to Work is about freedom — the freedom to join — or not to join. Likewise, America allows (or used to allow) people who created companies to run them as they saw fit. If the NLRB achieves their goal they will knock down two freedoms at one time.

Share

NLRB Digging the Hole Deeper

The spokesman for the NLRB, in trying to defend the agency’s decision to punish Boeing for moving part of its operations to a Right to Work state, does the agency no favors trying to defend the indefensible.

According to The Street,  NLRB Spokeswoman Nancy Cleeland said, “We are not telling Boeing they can’t build planes in South Carolina. We are talking about one specific piece of work: three planes a month. If they keep those three planes a month in Washington, there is no problem.”

It’s clear the bureaucrats at the NLRB now admit they believe they can mirco-manage the operations of America’s companies. Keep digging, NLRB! Keep digging.

Share

The NLRB’s action against South Carolina Boeing employees is mystifying even to a former NLRB Board member appointed by pro-Big Labor President Bill Clinton.

Bill Gould, a Clinton Administration Board member is “mystified” by the NLRB’s actions. “The Boeing case is unprecedented,” he says. “I agree with much of what this board has done and is likely to do, but I don’t agree with what the general counsel has done in the Boeing case. The general counsel is trying to equate an employer’s concern with strikes that disrupt production and make it difficult to make deadlines—he’s trying to equate that with hostility toward trade unionism. I don’t think that makes sense.”

From the Slate post, Air Rage by David Weigel:

Bill Gould has some advice for the labor movement: Turn back. Turn back before it’s too late.

“The administration is acting like a bunch of thugs,” said Sen. Jim DeMint. “If this is checks and balances, God help our country,” said Gov. Nikki Haley. “This is nothing more than bullying by the labor unions. This is President Obama and Harry Reid carrying their water.”

Share

Did the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) act independently when it filed a complaint against Boeing Aircraft that would cost 1,000 men and women to lose their jobs in South Carolina? Apparently, the National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation intends to find out.

The National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation has released a copy of its NLRB Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and it looks like its focus is not limited to the White House, but also includes any communications with Washington Governor Chris Gregoire and Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.

The pertinent part of the FOIA is in the image below, or you can click here to download the Foundation’s full FOIA.

Share

Matt Mayer of the Buckeye Institute debunks the long-term economic growth without Right To Work freedom is sustainable. Mayer uses a Columbus Dispatch reporter Joe Hatlett column that featured Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm to expose the fact that corporate welfare and reduced regulations ignore the “proverbial elephant in the room weighing down” compulsory union states like Indiana, Ohio, Illinois,, and Michigan.

From Matt Mayer’s post:

“With Michigan bleeding jobs and tax revenues, Granholm said she followed the corporate playbook in her attempt to close a huge state budget deficit and make Michigan more competitive. ‘In listening to the business community, I cut takes [sic] 99 times, and I ended shrinking government more than any state in the nation. In my two terms, I cut more by far than any state in the nation. And yet, we still have the highest unemployment rate.

There was no correlation.’ Granholm conceded that streamlining business regulations and lowering taxes — Kasich’s economic recovery mantra — are helpful, but they aren’t a panacea…[l]abor costs, help with start-up costs and proximity to markets are other factors.”

Hallett and Governor Granholm fail to mention why streamlining regulations and lowering taxes aren’t helping the northern states (located within 50 percent of the U.S. population and with low start-up costs) compete against the southern and western states. Instead, Hallett ignores the obvious answer and pleads for an end to corporate pork (with which we enthusiastically agree).

The reason Michigan and Ohio can’t compete is that the southern and western states already have fewer regulations and lower taxes, so “catching up” with those states still leaves the proverbial elephant in the room weighing down the northern states. Plus, those states are also pushing for lower taxes and fewer regulations, so the northern states are perpetually behind them. The elephant, which Governor Granholm does hint at, is labor costs, or, more specifically, unionized labor costs (see: General Motors and the United Auto Workers).

As I noted in Six Principles for Fixing Ohio, “Of course, tax and regulatory burdens also impact a state’s economy. Although many of the forced unionization states have heavy tax burdens and many of the worker freedom states have light tax burdens, some heavily taxed worker freedom states (Idaho, Nevada, and Utah) had the strongest sustained job growth from 1990 to today.

Similarly, a few moderately taxed forced unionization states still had weak job growth (Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri). The combination of both a heavy tax burden and forced unionization is deadly when it comes to job growth, as 11 of the 15 worst performing states are ranked in the top 20 for high tax burdens.” If Ohio and the other states from Missouri to Maine want to truly compete with Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina, then those states need to enact laws that protect the rights of workers not to join a labor union to get a job. (more…)

Share

Oregon Under Teacher Union’s Thumb

The Oregon teacher’s union, using their forced unionism privileges, spent a remarkable amount of money fighting educational reform.  ”. . .the nation’s two large teachers’ unions and their state affiliates contributed $357 per teacher to elections,” making it the biggest spending teacher’s union in the nation.  The union bosses pumped over $10 million into efforts battling three initiatives including one that would tie pay raises to classroom performance.

Share

Is The Tide Turning?

The greed and avarice of the labor union bosses has gotten so bad that their allies in government are starting to say “no” the the never ending list of demands that are bankrupting the country.  The New York Times (of all places) reports:

Stephen M. Sweeney, the president of the State Senate here, glowered with disgust as he described how one New Jersey town paid out nearly $1 million to four retiring police officers for their unused sick days and vacation time.

Mr. Sweeney, a Democrat, also scowled about the estimated $46 billion New Jersey owes in pension contributions and its $58 billion in liabilities to finance retiree health coverage for government employees.

For years, Republican lawmakers have railed against public employees’ pay and benefits, but now another breed of elected official is demanding labor concessions, too: current and former labor leaders and allies themselves.

After 12 years erecting steel beams for office buildings, Mr. Sweeney became a top official in New Jersey’s ironworkers union, now holding that post along with his legislative one. He says the state can no longer afford the benefits won over the years by public sector unions.

“At some point, you reach the limit of your ability to pay,” he said. (more…)

Share