80% of Union Members Agree, Right To Work is Best Policy

 

When asked, workers choose freedom, even union workers. In Frank Luntz’ recent poll, 80% of union members chose the Right To Work which allows individuals to freely choose whether or not to belong or pay fees to union.

Here is the question Luntz’ pollsters asked union members across the country and the results are above:

Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the following statement: “Workers should have the right to decide whether to join a union. They should never be forced or coerced to join or pay dues to a union as a condition of employment.”

For the complete Frank Luntz – National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation 2010 Union Member Survey click here.

Share

Oppressive State Government Employers

Proponents of the Card Check Forced Unionism bill can’t seem to keep their stories straight.  They claim they must eliminate the use of a secret ballot election to ensure workers can unionize over the objections of their abusive bosses and the companies they work for.

But in Maine, big labor supporters are proposing a version of the Card Check Forced Unionism bill that would end the secret ballot for state employees.  Is the state such an abusive employer that state workers can’t form a union with a secret ballot election?  

The same holds true for Hawaii.  

The bottom line is the Card Check bill and every variation thereof is about forcing people into unions without their consent.  Nothing more; nothing less.

Share
Tagged with:
Posted in: Card Check, Hawaii, Maine

Maine public employees may find themselves literally under attack if “LD 934, An Act to Clarify Public Sector Employee Fair Choice in Collective Bargaining” passes.  This will eliminate secret ballot options from employees and invited union organizers into the workers’ homes to persuade them to sign a card check form.  This bill is a state version of the forced unionism card check schemes in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, H.R. 1409 and S. 560 respectively.

 Tony Payne of Alliance for Maine’s future writes: 

Here’s what the bill’s summary says: “Under current law, if a state employee organization or public employee organization files a request with a public employer alleging that a majority of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit wish to be represented for the purpose of collective bargaining, the public employer may request an election to determine whether there exists majority support among the employees for such representation. This bill provides instead that the public employer may request an inspection of the evidence of written majority authorization on the part of the employees.”

This bill eliminates the right of any public sector employer in Maine (towns, counties, government agencies, etc.) to call for an election. The bill strikes the word “election” and substitutes it with the word “inspection”.

Worse yet, the bill exposes our state, county and municipal workers to potential coercion – just like the federal card check bill that also is known as the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). What’s also troubling with this bill is there is no evidence that the system is broken.

Employers in both the public and private sectors should be concerned with this attempt to circumvent the secret ballot. The right of workers to organize for purposes of collective bargaining is an important backstop to employer practices that are unfair or unsafe. This measure, however, is simply an invitation to abuse a system that currently serves the interests of employers, employees and the taxpayers.

Even though it’s summer, please let your legislators know how you feel about public employers and employees losing their right to a secret ballot.

Share

Harkin's Threat

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) is threatening to move the Card Check Forced Unionism bill to the Senate floor as introduced unless a some other forced unionism scheme is worked out.  Frankly, an up-or-down vote on the Harkin bill would be a great opportunity for workers to see what Senators truly believe in forced unionism.  Senators would not have any fig leaf to hide behind.

Sens. Arlen Specter (D-PA), Jim Webb (D-VA), Mark Pryor (D-AK) and Diane Feinstein (D-CA) are participating in preliminary talks to find a “compromise.”  Seems like a great list of Senators to contact to voice your objections to any and all versions of the Card Check Forced Unionism bill.  Add Senators Warner (VA), Landrieu (LA), Lincoln-Lambert (AK), Snowe (ME), Collins (ME)  Nelson (NE), Conrad (ND), Johnson (SD), Dorgan (ND) and Reid (NV) to that list as well.  Senators can be reached by calling the Senate Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

Share

Another $20 Million in Big Labor Political Spending

Add another $20 million in the already ballooning political budget of the union bosses. The “Change to Win labor federation” is “. . . spending more than $20 million — mostly under the radar — to help elect Democrats in battleground states,” Marc Ambinder notes in his blog for the Atlantic.

The CTW union effort, focused principally in 14 states, most of them with competitive Senate races, compliments a mostly separate effort by the AFL-CIO, which has budgeted $53.4 million on its political program. Change To Win unions disaffiliated from the AFL-CIO in 2006 to focus on organizing. Since then, the two groups have worked well together, signing agreements to share information and some resources. Change to Win unions have worked with the National Education Association, the Steelworkers, and the Communications Workers of America — the latter two being stalwart AFL-CIO unions — on specific projects. Unilaterally, the Change to Win unions have mailed more than 31.2 million persuasion placards, made nearly 4.6 million phone calls, and made millions of what the unions call “member to member” contacts — direct engagements with union members, often at worksites.

Anna Burger the CTW’s president, said that more than 3000 union members had worked more than 40,000 volunteer shifts on the Obama campaign’s behalf in 14 battlegrounds. About 1250 of those union members canvassed white, working class union members. Burger said the mood among workers in these states has shifted from “anxiety to anger” about the economy, and that economic discontent was behind a recent surge of support for Democrats. CTW executive director Chris Chafe said that the economy, combined with union muscle, was putting Senate seats into play that Democrats had previously written off, including Rep. Tom Allen’s challenge to Sen. Susan Collins in Maine. On election day, more than 50,000 CTW members will have participated in the political program, he said.

Share
Tagged with:
Posted in: Forced-Dues for Politics, Maine

Locke v. Karass

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation has a new video.

In the latest update to Right to Work’s YouTube channel, Daniel Locke, lead plaintiff in the Foundation’s Locke v. Karass Supreme Court case, discusses why he felt the need to file suit against Maine State Employees Association union officials.

Also in the video, Foundation president Mark Mix explains what is at stake in the case, and another Maine state employee, Mark Turek, discusses his decision to quit his job rather than be forced to pay union dues to a union he disagreed with.

Share
Posted in: Court Cases, Maine

Support Union Bosses at Your Own Peril

The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace (CDW) today released results from a series of surveys in the battleground states of Minnesota, Colorado and Maine conducted by McLaughlin & Associates showing that the Card Check Forced Unionism Bill is hurting its supporters at the ballot box.

Nearly two-thirds of voters in Colorado (68%), Maine (72%) and Minnesota (65%) oppose the Card Check scam. Moreover, voters in Minnesota and Colorado would be less likely to support candidates who support elimination of workplace secret ballot elections. Specifically, a plurality of voters would be less likely to vote for Mark Udall (44%) and Al Franken (41%) if they support this legislation.

Share

Union Dues and Don’ts

The Las Vegas Review Journal eloquently details the stakes of the upcoming Supreme Court’s case from Maine.

Share
Tagged with:
Posted in: Court Cases, Forced-Dues for Politics, Maine, SEIU