PLA’s DOA in Louisiana

The state of Louisiana proved it is serious about protecting taxpayer money on their construction projects when Gov. Bobby Jindal signed S.B. 76, a bill to prohibit government-mandated project labor agreements (PLAs).

The bill protects taxpayers by ensuring that they get the highest quality work at the best possible price. PLAs, on the other hand, force taxpayer to pay inflated union wages often driving up the price of construction by nearly 25%.

In addition, the law demonstrates Louisiana’s commitment to its Right to Work law by guaranteeing that workers are not forced to pay union dues as a condition of accepting a job in Louisiana. This preserves a worker’s choice on whether or not to join or pay dues to a labor union.

We say Amen to that!

Share

Virginia’s stalwart Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is monitoring attempts by the Washington DC airports authority to require union-only labor and will file suit if a “project labor agreement” were put in place, contrary to Virginia’s Right to Work laws.

Share

Obama Pushes Back For Union Bosses

The Obama Administration goes to bat for Big Labor – again. The Hill’s John T. Bennett reports:

The White House said it “strongly opposes” a provision in the House Appropriations Committee’s military construction and Veterans Affairs appropriations bill that would block the administration from encouraging the use of so-called “project labor agreements” (PLAs). Such pacts allow government contracts to be awarded exclusively to unionized companies.

The Obama administration says the use of these arrangements “can provide structure and stability to large construction projects,” according to the policy statement. “The coordination achieved through PLAs can significantly enhance the economy and efficiency of Federal construction projects.”

That wording is similar to a February 2009 executive order stating it was the administration’s policy to encourage “executive agencies to consider requiring the use of project labor agreements in connection with large-scale construction projects in order to promote economy and efficiency in federal procurement.”

The House panel’s language would prohibit future use of that order.

“The vast majority of contractors and their employees — more than 80 percent — have voluntarily opted against unionization,” according to the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. “Because most contractors and employees choose to refrain from unionization when they have the free choice, Big Labor turned to politicians to remove that choice and impose union representation on employees from the top down.” (more…)

Share

Lawmaker Calls for Conflict of Interest Probe

Virginia delegate Tim Hugo is calling for an investigation into the Dulles Metrorail project and the Metropolitian Washington Airport Authority’s demand that the project be governed by a wasteful Project Labor Agreement (PLA) that will drive up the price of construction unncessarily.

In a letter to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuchinelli, Hugo claimed that the airports authority appears to have violated its own ethics code as well as state conflict-of-interest statutes by allowing board member Dennis Martire, vice president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, to vote for the agreement. Hugo charged that the union Martire represents would “reap a financial windfall” as a result of the agreement, the Washington Examiner reports. “Should MWAA move forward with this ill-advised measure, it will discriminate against nonunion construction firms and the 96 percent of construction workers in Virginia who have chosen to not belong to a union,” Hugo wrote. It will also “discourage competition; and ultimately greatly increase the overall cost of the project.”

Should contractors win the bid, the agreement would require them to provide union wages and benefits and hire union workers even though the construction will take place in Virginia, a right-to-work state — which means an employee can’t be forced to join a union to get a job.

Critics of the labor agreement, citing studies from the Boston-based, free-market think tank Beacon Hill Institute, said it will increase project costs by 12 percent to 18 percent. The cost of the second phase, originally estimated at $2.5 billion, has already jumped by over $1 billion, most of which will be paid by Loudoun and Fairfax counties and Dulles Toll Road users.

Share

PLA’s DOA in Tennessee

Project Labor Agreements (PLAs), kickbacks to Big Labor unions that drive up the cost of construction projects by nearly 25% have been banned in Tennessee thanks to legislation signed into law by Gov. Bill Haslam. Tennessee is the fourth state to ban PLA’s in 2011, joining another four that had previously banned PLA’s on projects funded by the taxpayers.

In an age of belt-tightening, there is no reason to pay inflated dollars for construction contracts all to please Big Labor.

Share

Are They Serious?

Big labor threw the kitchen sink in the fight to prevent Republicans from gaining a majority in Congress but there are still two dozen Republican members who seem prepared to carry the water for the union bosses.  

When freshman Rep. Frank Guinta (R-NH) offered an amendment to end anti-competitive Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) on federal funded projects, 26 Republicans voted against his amendment.  The list of opponents include the usual suspects like Rep. Peter King (R-NY), Rep. Don Young (R-AK) and Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) — long-time supporters of the big labor.  But shockingly, others like Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-LA) and Rep. Thad McCotter (R-MI) voted with the union bosses.  

If Republicans are serious about ending deficits, shutting the spigot of taxpayer dollars to big labor would be a good place to start.  Unfortunately, two dozen Republicans don’t seem to have the fortitude to get the job done

Share

Nancy Pelosi Threatens to Join the Government Shut Down Party

Rather than deal with many of the fiscal issues brought about by unsustainable congressional gifts to Big Government Union Bosses and their private sector Big Labor counterparts, Nancy Pelosi threatens to join the movement for a federal government shutdown.  A shutdown forces all non-essential federal government employees to go home without pay.  (Of course in the past when these “non-essential” employees returned, congress basically paid them for their time-off without a loss in regularly pay or vacation pay.)

It is time for congress to deal with the problem of forced unionism and its costs to society as well as to the future of the American Dream.

From the Politico:

A high-ranking aide to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told Democratic chiefs of staff that a government shutdown is more likely than not, according to attendees. Speaking at a regular meeting of the top aides to House Democrats, Pelosi’s floor director, Jerry Hartz, offered up his assessment that the odds favor inaction before the government runs out of money, sources said. A shutdown would only happen if the House and Senate can’t reach a deal on the continuing resolution that expires on March 4.

Share

Taxpayers Getting Railroaded — Big Labor gets the Dough

The Obama Administration is championing the construction and subsidization of Amtrak and high speed railroad.  Not surprisingly, Big Labor is a big beneficiary of the scheme through the implementation of Project Labor Agreements that drive up the cost of construction by nearly 25% — in order to payoff the union bosses.  Michelle Malkin looks at the key players that will send billions of taxpayer dollars down the tracks.

Share