» Welcome

The National Right to Work Committee® is a coalition of 2.2 million American citizens united by one belief:

No one should be forced to pay tribute to a union in order to get or keep a job.

These citizens agree that Federal labor law should not promote coercive union power, and support the protection and enactment of additional state Right to Work laws until the federal sanction for compulsory unionism is eliminated.

Click here to learn more about the National Right to Work Committee and how you can help.

Help Us Fight Forced Unionism!

Contribute Now!

We at the National Right to Work Committee are fighting at many levels to protect America's working men and women's right to decide for themselves whether or not a union deserves their financial support.

Whether it be in the state and federal legislatures, the courts, or hearing rooms at the FEC or the NLRB, we fight to ensure that workers join unions because they want to -- not out of fear or federal mandate.

Please become an active member by pledging a monthly gift, or by helping us financially on one of the specific legislative efforts highlighted above.

National Right to Work Committee
8001 Braddock Road
Springfield, VA 22160
703-321-9820 (p)
703-321-7342 (f)
Email: members@NRTW.org

Because of NRTWC's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501 (C) (4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contribu tions (IRC 170) or as a business deduction (IRC 162(e)(1).

Right to Work Blog

News & commentary from the legislative trail

Unionism by Government Fiat

An executive order by Democrat Gov. Bill Ritter opened the door to unionization of state employees, and the Colorado Springs Gazette estimates that nearly two-thirds of the state’s 32,000 government employees could be unionized by next month. Ritter’s order opened the door to a Card Check Scheme where, “[i]f 30 percent of the workers in any group sign petitions seeking an election, it allows them to vote on allowing one union to represent them in creating an ‘employee partnership agreement’ with the state.”

Colorado Springs Republican Rep. Bob Gardner, who has complained that unionized employees would demand greater compensation and strain the state’s budget, was not surprised after what he called an aggressive push by union leaders.

Although the order did not mandate binding arbitration, “Ben DeGrow, a policy analyst with the conservative Independence Institute, argued, however, that permitting partnerships opens the door to further allowances, including binding arbitration.”

Putting a layer of bureaucracy between employees and their managers also could serve to remove workers one step further from the taxpayers who are supposed to be their bosses, said Bob Culwell, a supervisor in the state Treasurer’s Office who opposes unionization.

Culwell called the push heavy-handed – he said he knows of state workers who have gotten visited at home by union representatives – and the campaigning has been done by union organizers rather than employees.

“I believe it’s in the realm of absolute metaphysical certitude that it could hurt taxpayers if this happens,” Culwell said. “The union, by definition, would be standing between them and would be operating in the interests of its members and, therefore, to the non-benefits of citizens.”

Leave a Reply